![]() ![]() With no special setup, DF14 and Stockfish 7-64-bit easily attain 3500-4000kN/s. The engines compared have been set up with varying amounts of system memory from 128gb to 4096gb for the hash file, and using 4 cores. My system is a quad-core AMD chip with 8gb of ram and solid state hard drive. The main problem I am having with Fritz 15 is that the engine runs very slowly in comparison to other engines and results in taking a long time to get to the same ply depth during game analysis. My hope was that this had been addressed in Fritz 15, but it hasn't. ![]() My main gripe with DF14 was with the Database Browser pane, and the fact that there was no way it would show your personally created databases, and even for Chessbase databases it would only show a maximum of 6 databases. After using it, I do get the feeling that I don't have much for my money. I was a happy user of Deep Fritz 14, with a couple of reservations, and decided when Fritz 15 came out that I would invest my hard-earned wonga in it. Apologies to those of you who read this in my blog, but perhaps the forums are a better place for it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |